Translations
Published 2023-01-01
Keywords
- Boredom,
- Pandemic,
- Lockdown,
- COVID-19,
- Entertainment
- Social Media ...More
How to Cite
Ros Velasco, J. (2023). Boredom in Pandemic Times: It Won’t Make Us More Creative (Unfortunately). Journal of Boredom Studies, (1). Retrieved from https://boredomsociety.com/jbs/index.php/journal/article/view/8
Copyright (c) 2023 Josefa Ros Velasco
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Abstract
Translation of Ros Velasco, J. (2021). La pandemia del aburrimiento durante el confinamiento por el COVID-19. In J. L. Villacañas Berlanga (Ed.), Pandemia. Ideas en la encrucijada (pp. 167–188). Biblioteca Nueva. Shortened and revised version reproduced with permission of Biblioteca Nueva.
References
- Benjamin, W. (1999). The Arcades Project. Harvard University Press.
- Blumenberg, H. (n.d.). UNF 166–167. Diesseits der Langeweile [unpublished manuscript]. In Schuber 1, Mappe 2. Deutsches Literaturarchiv Marbach.
- Blumenberg, H. (1986). Lebenszeit und Weltzeit. Suhrkamp.
- Kierkegaard, S. (2004). Either/Or: A Fragment of Life. Penguin Random House.
- Lefebvre, H. (1970). Du rural à l'urbain. Anthropos.
- Neu, J. (1998). Boring from Within: Endogenous Versus Reactive Boredom. In W. F. Flack Jr. and J. D. Laird (Eds.), Series in Affective Science. Emotions in Psychopathology: Theory and Research (pp. 158–170). Oxford University Press.
- Ros Velasco, J. (2021). La pandemia del aburrimiento durante el confinamiento por el COVID-19. In J. L. Villacañas Berlanga (Ed.), Pandemia. Ideas en la encrucijada (pp. 167–188). Biblioteca Nueva. Shortened and revised version reproduced with permission of Biblioteca Nueva.
- Ros Velasco, J. (2022). La enfermedad del aburrimiento. Alianza Editorial.
- Svendsen, L. (2005). A Philosophy of Boredom. Reaktion Books.
- Toohey, P. (2011). Boredom: A Lively History. Yale University Press.
- Westgate, E. C., and Wilson, T. D. (2018). Boring Thoughts and Bo-red Minds: The MAC Model of Boredom and Cognitive Engagement. Psychological Review, 125(5), 689–713. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000097