Journal of Boredom Studies

No. 4 (2026)
Articles

Living Through Change: Boredom and the Rhetoric of Modern Experience

PDF HTML
  • Elizabeth S. Goodstein
Elizabeth S. Goodstein
Emory College

Published 2026-05-11

Keywords

  • Boredom Studies,
  • Interdisciplinary inquiry,
  • Georg Simmel,
  • Boredom and change,
  • Personalization of alienation

How to Cite

Goodstein, E. S. (2026). Living Through Change: Boredom and the Rhetoric of Modern Experience. Journal of Boredom Studies, (4). Retrieved from https://boredomsociety.com/jbs/index.php/journal/article/view/74

Copyright (c) 2026 Elizabeth S. Goodstein

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Abstract

After a brief meditation on how a pluralistic and anti-essentialist approach to Boredom Studies can help us navigate challenges that characterize interdisciplinary knowledge formations more generally, this paper takes up the theoretical and practical problem of thinking boredom as a historically situated, embodied experience (or failure of experience): not as a timeless crisis of meaning, but rather as a historically specific configuration of empty, meaningless time. As I show, boredom’s seeming ubiquity amidst the ongoing social, cultural, and technological transformation that defines the modern world is at once historically and philosophically significant. As an index of the problems of meaning that accompany the challenges of living through historic change, boredom today at once resembles and differs from past forms and permutations of the experience. Expanding our sights to encompass the intertwining varieties of malaise in the contemporary world—not just boredom, but loneliness, anxiety, depression, despair, and all their siblings—can help counter the personalization of alienation by revealing the axes connecting individualized suffering to the social, political, and ecological challenges of our time.

PDF HTML

References

  1. Benjamin, W. (1982). Das Passagen-Werk, vol. 1. Suhrkamp.
  2. Bergson, H. (1913). Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. Kessinger Publishing Company.
  3. Boddice, R. (2024). The History of Emotions: Second Edition. Manchester University Press.
  4. Bogard, P. (2023). Solastalgia: An Anthology of Emotion in a Disappearing World. University of Virginia Press.
  5. Clayton, S. (2023). A New Word for New Feelings. In P. Bogard (Ed.,), Solastalgia: An Anthology of Emotion in a Disappearing World (pp. 81–83). University of Virginia Press.
  6. Fleck, L. (1980). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache. Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Suhrkamp.
  7. Goodstein, E. (2005). Experience without Qualities: Boredom and Modernity. Stanford University Press.
  8. Goodstein, E. (2017). Georg Simmel and the Disciplinary Imaginary. Stanford University Press.
  9. Goodstein, E. (2020). Boredom Studies and the Disciplinary Imaginary. In J. Ros Velasco (Ed.), The Culture of Boredom (pp. 23–54). Brill.
  10. Goodstein, E. (2021). Boredom, Temporality, and the Historical Dynamics of Abstract Negativity. In P. Giacomoni, S. Dellantonio, and N. Valentini (Eds.), The Dark Side: Philosophical Reflections on the “Negative Emotions” (pp. 177–195). Springer.
  11. Goodstein, E. (2025). Spectacular Desolation: Boredom as a Political Phenomenon. In A. Elpidorou and J. Ros Velasco (Eds.), The History and Philosophy of Boredom (pp. 228–250). Routledge.
  12. Heidegger, M. (1983). Die Grundbegriffe der Metaphysik. Vittorio Klostermann.
  13. Hobsbawm, E. (1996). The Age of Revolution: Europe 1789-1848. Vintage.
  14. Koselleck, R. (1979). Vergangene Zukunft. Zur Semantik geschichtlicher Zeiten. Suhrkamp.
  15. Kuhn, R. (1976). The Demon of Noontide. Ennui in Western Literature. Princeton University Press.
  16. Musharbash, Y. (2007). Boredom, Time, and Modernity: An Example from Aboriginal Australia. American Anthropologist, 109, 307–317. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2007.109.2.307
  17. Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). (2023a). Our Epidemic of Loneliness and Isolation: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on the Healing Effects of Social Connection and Community. US Department of Health and Human Services.
  18. Office of the Surgeon General (OSG). (2023b). Social Media and Youth Mental Health: The U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory. US Department of Health and Human Services.
  19. Simmel, G. (1989). Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 6. Philosophie des Geldes. Suhrkamp.
  20. Simmel, G. (1995). Die Grossstädte und das Geistesleben. In Georg Simmel Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 7. Aufsätze und Abhandlungen 1901-1908 Band I (pp. 116–131). Suhrkamp.
  21. Skowronek, J., Seifert, A., & Lindberg, S. (2023). The Mere Presence of a Smartphone Reduces Basal Attentional Performance. Scientific Reports, 13, 9363. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-36256-4
  22. Thompson, E. P. (1967). Time, Work-Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism. Past & Present, 38, 56–97.
  23. Ward, A. F., Duke, K., Gneezy, A., & Bos, M. W. (2017). Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(2), 140–154. https://doi.org/10.1086/691462
  24. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. Public Affairs/Hachette.